Sensitivity of Capillary Electrophoresis to Detect Monoclonal Immunoglobulins: a Report of Two Cases and a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins (MIg) is a key element in the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies. METHODS: Here we report two cases of high concentration serum IgM-kappa MIgs (6.4 g/L and 6.8 g/L) not detected with capillary electrophoresis (CE). A systematic literature search was conducted to assess the sensitivity of CE to detect MIgs. RESULTS: The CE sensitivity to detect MIgs did not exceed 0.9 to 0.95 compared to immunofixation as standard. On the one hand, MIgs with blood concentrations below 1 g/L may be hidden by other serum proteins. On the other hand, some MIgs of high concentrations are not detected due to their insolubility in the electrophoresis buffer. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a second SPE with agarose gel electrophoresis method or modifying buffer properties may reveal some MIgs not detected by a first SPE alone.

Detection of monoclonal protein by capillary zone electrophoresis can be challenged by iodinated contrast agent interference: a case report.

The detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins is a key element in the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy. In clinical practice, screening and measurement of monoclonal proteins are commonly performed using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). Some exogenous substances, such as iodinated contrast agents, absorb incident UV light at the same wavelengths as the peptide bonds and may therefore interfere with the detection of proteins in CZE. We herein use the description of a case to illustrate that iodinated contrast agents can mask the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in CZE and we discuss the strategy needed to confirm this interference. Performing immunofixation, immunosubtraction, or a second CZE at a distance from the first blood sample is not only necessary to confirm the presence of an iodinated contrast media interference but also to ensure the absence of monoclonal proteins.

Comparison of the New, Rapid, and Fully Automated Kryptor TSH receptor Antibodies Assay (B.R.A.H.M.S.) with the Radioimmunological Assay (B.R.A.H.M.S.).

BACKGROUND: Radioimmunoassays, which are often not automated and time-consuming, are gradually being re-placed in medical laboratories by non-radioactive methods that need to be evaluated. The purpose was to compare the measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies (TRAb) by the new Brahms' kit using Kryptor TRACE technology and the Brahms' radioimmunoassay. METHODS: We prospectively collected all samples from patients who received thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies testing in July 2018 at the University Hospital of Brest. The radioimmunoassay used was the Dynotest TRAK human by BRAHMS Diagnostica (Berlin, Germany). The Kryptor method used the BRAHMS TRAK human Kryptor kit performed with the Kryptor Compact Plus system. RESULTS: The inter-assay coefficient variations for the radioimmunological and Kryptor methods were 11.07% and 8.36%, respectively, with the low level quality control and 8.36% and 4.38%, respectively, with the high level quality control. Forty-four patients were included in the study including thirty-two Graves' disease patients in follow-up. The sensitivity of the radioimmunological method for the detection of Graves' disease was 0.94 and the specificity was 0.73. The sensitivity of the Kryptor method was 0.91 and the specificity was 0.91. A non-proportional systematic bias in favor of higher values of TRAb concentrations with the radioimmunological method was observed: slope of 0.93 (0.74 - 1.07, 95% confidence interval) and an intercept of -0.69 IU/L (-1.58 to -0.30, 95% confidence interval). Compared to the Kryptor method, the radioimmunological method tends to overestimate TRAb concentrations by up to 120%. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated Brahms Kryptor kit using TRACE technology to measure TRAb reduces sampling time and intra- as well as inter-assay variations. The Kryptor kit underestimates the results of TRAb leading to a lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared to the radioimmunoassay. Thus, the new Brahms Kryptor kit has good laboratory performances but the interpretation of the results must still be performed with caution.

Systematic overestimation of human serum albumin by capillary zone electrophoresis method due to monoclonal immunoglobulin interferences.

BACKGROUND: The capillary zone electrophoresis method of albumin measurement is frequently used in monoclonal gammopathy patients but some studies suggest poor performances of the method in this population. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of serum monoclonal immunoglobulins on human serum albumin determination by capillary zone electrophoresis method compared to other available methods. METHOD: We prospectively measured albumin in 100 freshly collected non-frozen serum samples in a monoclonal gammopathy patients population, by using four different methods: the capillary zone electrophoresis method, the bromocresol purple dye method, the nephelometric method and the turbidimetric method. Differences in albumin values between the different methods were analysed with respect to serum monoclonal immunoglobulin concentration. These differences were further investigated by measuring albumin levels in human serum samples spiked with exogenous monoclonal immunoglobulins. RESULTS: Human serum albumin difference values between capillary zone electrophoresis compared to immunonephelometry method are significantly correlated with increasing monoclonal immunoglobulins concentrations: regression analyses revealed a correlation coefficient r2 = 0.60 and a slope of 0.14 (0.12-0.17, 95% confidence interval). The capillary zone electrophoresis method overestimated serum albumin levels by up to 67% (12 g/L) when monoclonal immunoglobulin level was 63 g/L. The determination of albumin levels in human serum samples spiked with exogenous monoclonal immunoglobulins showed an overestimation of human serum albumin measurement by the capillary zone electrophoresis method proportional to the amount of monoclonal immunoglobulin added in the serum with a slope of 0.19 (0.18-0.20, 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSION: Monoclonal immunoglobulins directly interfere with serum albumin measurement by the capillary zone electrophoresis method leading to a systematic overestimation of serum albumin concentrations proportional to the serum monoclonal immunoglobulin level.